Stress-Testing Your Strategy: Building Resilience in Uncertain Times
Is your strategy built to last, or just built for today?
Leaders often develop strategies assuming a stable, predictable future. Traditional risk management looks backwards, relying on past data. Planning cycles favour continuity. But we operate in a volatile, interconnected world where disruption is the norm. This reality exposes a critical gap: many leaders underuse strategic foresight, leaving their strategies vulnerable when the context shifts¹.
How can you ensure your strategy and corresponding plans remain effective, even when faced with unexpected shocks? The answer lies in strategic stress-testing².
This foresight-based approach moves beyond traditional risk analysis. Instead of asking, “What is likely to happen?” it asks, “Will our strategy still work if the future changes significantly?”.
It’s about assessing preparedness for plausible yet disruptive future events.
This edition explores why stress-testing is vital for enterprise resilience, introduces practical tools, and shares examples of how it informs strategic adaptation.
Why Stress-Test Your Strategy?
Most strategies aren't rigorously tested against futures different from the expected one. They are optimised for a preferred future, often extending the present³. These untested plans usually prove fragile when a significant change occurs – a pandemic, a financial crisis, or a trade war.
Strategic stress-testing tackles this head-on. It shifts the focus from prediction to preparation⁴, helping organisations build resilience by:
Uncovering Hidden Assumptions: Strategies rest on beliefs about markets, technology, regulations, and operations. Stress-testing forces these assumptions into the open and challenges them: What happens if this core belief no longer holds? Identifying these hidden vulnerabilities is the first step towards improving a strategy.
Evaluating Strategy Robustness: Using alternative future scenarios, stress-testing assesses how well a strategy performs under different, challenging conditions. Can objectives still be met? Do processes hold up? Are resources and capabilities still sufficient? This reveals potential breaking points before a crisis hits.
Enabling Adaptive Redesign: Identifying weaknesses allows for proactive adjustments. Leaders can build contingency plans, identify "no-regret" moves (actions beneficial across multiple futures), and design more flexible, resilient strategies better equipped to handle turbulence.
The goal isn't to predict the future but to ensure your strategy isn't easily broken by it.
Tools for Stress-Testing Strategy
Two key frameworks help structure the stress-testing process:
Assumption-Based Planning (ABP):
This is the starting point. ABP involves systematically identifying and examining the core assumptions underpinning your strategy. What must be true about the external environment and your internal capabilities for the strategy to succeed? The focus is on critical assumptions that are uncertain or hard to verify⁵.
Windtunneling:
This technique uses scenarios to test the resilience of strategic options⁶. Imagine putting a new aircraft design through a wind tunnel to see how it performs under various stress conditions.
How it works:
Develop a set of distinct scenarios (often using a 2x2 scenario matrix of key uncertainties). These should explore challenging possibilities, not just variations of the baseline forecast.
List your key strategic initiatives or options. Systematically assess how each strategic option fares within each scenario, using criteria like viability, feasibility, required capabilities, and adaptability.
Score the options (e.g., on a simple scale) within each scenario to identify which strategies are robust (perform reasonably well across multiple futures) and which are fragile (dependent on a single future).
Use the insights to refine strategies, build flexibility, or develop contingency plans.
Stress-Testing in Action: Case Examples
Governments and defence organisations already use stress-testing to enhance preparedness:
NATO Strategic Foresight Analysis (SFA): NATO employs scenario-based stress-testing to anticipate future threats and assess defence readiness. This informs long-term capability planning for diverse challenges, such as cyber warfare and climate change impacts⁷.
UK Government: The UK has applied stress-testing across various policy areas, including defence (MOD) and environment (DEFRA). For instance, The Government's 25-year Environment Plan was tested against future scenarios to ensure its long-term resilience, leading to policy adjustments⁸.
New Zealand Treasury: New Zealand stress-tested its fiscal strategy against shocks like pandemics and natural disasters. This revealed vulnerabilities and led to more substantial fiscal buffers linked to long-term stewardship obligations⁹.
European Union: Recognizing the need for more resilient policies, the EU explores and integrates strategic foresight, including stress-testing methodologies, into its law-making processes to better prepare for disruptive events¹⁰.
These examples highlight that stress-testing isn't just a theoretical exercise; it leads to tangible changes in strategic direction and policy design.
Applying Stress-Testing in Your Enterprise
You can integrate strategic stress-testing through these practical steps:
Identify Critical Assumptions: Use Assumption-Based Planning to map out what must hold for your strategy's success. Prioritise the most crucial and uncertain assumptions.
Develop Scenarios: Create 3-4 distinct, challenging, and relevant future scenarios. Focus on key external uncertainties that would significantly impact your strategy. Push beyond comfortable baseline projections.
Test and Evaluate: Use a simple matrix (strategies vs scenarios) to assess how your key initiatives will perform in the future. Use clear criteria (e.g., viability, resource needs, adaptability).
Identify Robust Options and Refine: Determine which strategies perform well across multiple scenarios. Adapt or discard fragile options. Build contingency plans for high-impact risks identified during the testing.
The Enterprise Architect's Role
Enterprise Architects are uniquely positioned to champion and facilitate strategic stress-testing. Operating at the nexus of strategy, technology, and transformation, EAs can:
Map strategic goals to underlying capabilities and dependencies.
Facilitate the critical process of surfacing hidden assumptions across business and IT silos.
Integrate scenario-based thinking into governance and planning cycles.
Translate strategic insights into concrete architectural patterns and technology choices.
By embedding stress-testing, EA moves beyond alignment and optimisation to actively build enterprise adaptability.
Final Thought
Too often, strategies are only tested when they encounter the harsh reality of disruption. Strategic stress-testing flips the script, making potential failures visible before they happen.
It's not about predicting the future; it's about building strategies robust enough to withstand multiple possible futures. In an era of change, the essential question shifts from "Is our strategy right for today?" to "Is our strategy resilient enough for tomorrow?"
Further Reading
Backler, W., Iny, A., D’Intino, N., Parker, E., & Hirashita, S. (2025). Navigating the Future with Strategic Foresight. Retrieved from https://www.bcg.com/publications/2025/navigating-the-future-with-strategic-foresight
Demekas, D. G. (2020). "Chapter 3 Stress Tests as a Systemic Risk Assessment Tool". In Stress Testing. USA: International Monetary Fund. Retrieved Apr 15, 2025, from https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/book/9781484310717/ch003.xml
Kosow, H., & Gaßner, R. (2008). Methods of future and scenario analysis: Overview, assessment, and selection criteria (Studies 39). German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik. Retrieved from https://www.idos-research.de/uploads/media/Studies_39.2008.pdf
Dietz, M., Levy, C., Panayiotou, E., Pepanides, T., Petrov, A., Richter, K., & Stegemann, U. (2012). Strategic insight through stress-testing: How to connect the 'engine room' to the boardroom (McKinsey Working Papers on Risk, No. 35). McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/dotcom/client_service/risk/working%20papers/35_strategic_insight_through_stress-testing.ashx
Dewar, J. A. (2002). Assumption-based planning: A tool for reducing avoidable surprises. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam033/2002073460.pdf
Wind Tunnelling (also known as policy stress-testing). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.dpmc.govt.nz/our-programmes/policy-project/policy-methods-toolbox/futures-thinking/wind-tunnelling
North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Allied Command Transformation. (2023). Strategic foresight analysis 2023. Retrieved from https://www.act.nato.int/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/SFA2023_rev2.pdf
House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee. (2018). The Government's 25 Year Plan for the Environment (HC 803, Eighth Report of Session 2017–19). House of Commons. Retrieved from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmenvaud/803/803.pdf
Te Tai Ōhanga The Treasury. (2025). Te Ara Mokopuna 2025: Consultation on the draft content of the Treasury's Long-term Insights Briefing: Sustainable and resilient fiscal policy through economic shocks and cycles. https://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/consultation/draft-briefing-consultation-long-term-insights-briefing-2025
Fernandes, M., & Heflich, A. (2022). How to stress-test EU policies: Building a more resilient Europe for tomorrow (PE 699.474). European Parliamentary Research Service. https://doi.org/10.2861/301781
Thanks for reading!
If you enjoyed this, you’ll love the ideas in my other articles. Feel free to share this newsletter with a colleague.
